Welcome to our world exploring the Historical, Political and Technological aspects of Locks, Keys and Safes

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Cyberspace
    Posts
    1,318
    Country: Australia

    Default Halls Premier lock.

    I found this image on an old backup disc from a previous PC. I have no idea where I got it from. If it is your copyright please contact me.

    --

    Interesting version of the Halls Premier lock. Does anyone know more about this version ?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails image001.jpg  

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    133
    Country: United States

    Default Henry Gross' 1869 patent on Hall's Premier Lock?

    I'm reading the excellent American Genius: Nineteenth Century Bank Locks and Time Locks by the Errolls. On page 29 there is a reference to an 1869 patent to Hall employee Henry Gross for a combination lock...the Hall Premier. The earliest Gross patent to Hall that I've been nable to locate was published in 1870. And unfortunately this bit of information is not supplied either in the text or in a foot note. Does anyone have this patent number?

    Thanks in advance!

    Jack

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio USA
    Posts
    1,433
    Country: United States

    Default

    Jack, the Sept 7, 1869 patent date found on the bolt of Premier locks refers to #94,613 by W.F. Kistler, another Hall employee. It is not, however, for a Premier lock specifically. Kistler also has another 1870 patent that contributes to the Premier design. Gross has an 1869 patent but it is for a keylock. He does have at least 2 other 1870 patents for locks, one of which is the basis for the famous Hall Crescent lock. Doug

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    133
    Country: United States

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doug MacQueen View Post
    Jack, the Sept 7, 1869 patent date found on the bolt of Premier locks refers to #94,613 by W.F. Kistler, another Hall employee. It is not, however, for a Premier lock specifically. Kistler also has another 1870 patent that contributes to the Premier design. Gross has an 1869 patent but it is for a keylock. He does have at least 2 other 1870 patents for locks, one of which is the basis for the famous Hall Crescent lock. Doug
    Hi Doug & thanks for the prompt & authoritative response.

    I've just started extracting patent data from this presumably well-researched book (which is based on the Mossman Collection in NYC) & have been a bit surprised at the thinness of the scholarship contained in the text. I haven't been to see this Collection (housed at the General Society of Mechanics & Tradesmen building on West 44th St in Manhattan. See
    John M. Mossman Lock Collection | Exhibits | The General Society of Mechanics & Tradesmen of the City of New York) yet but I plan to visit later this year with a list of just these kind of points. They sell Mossman's The Lure of the Lock, which deals with this collection, as well as a CD containing the wonderful color photos of the items in the collection that are also found in the Errolls' book. I plan to add these items to my antique lock library shortly. I hope to learn more about these points during my visit, either from the exhibit labels or other information resources there.

    Jack

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio USA
    Posts
    1,433
    Country: United States

    Default

    Jack, I think you are being a little overly critical of "American Genius". Overall, it is a very well researched book. Ferreting out the true history of locks and lockmakers is not an easy task, especially when you consider that so many of the existing sources of information themselves have some misinformation in them. For example, take the 1928 "Lure Of The Lock" written about the Mossman Collection and a primary source book for "American Genius" . In it you will find a reference to the McBride and Davidson Safe Co. of Albany, N.Y. Still today, the company is referred to as McBride and Davidson. The problem is that there were not 2 men involved here. The owner was John McBride Davidson, one man not two. That little mistake has been handed down as fact for a long time and yes, will be found in "American Genius". Not a big deal but also not correct. Doug

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    133
    Country: United States

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doug MacQueen View Post
    Jack, I think you are being a little overly critical of "American Genius". Overall, it is a very well researched book. Ferreting out the true history of locks and lockmakers is not an easy task, especially when you consider that so many of the existing sources of information themselves have some misinformation in them. For example, take the 1928 "Lure Of The Lock" written about the Mossman Collection and a primary source book for "American Genius" . In it you will find a reference to the McBride and Davidson Safe Co. of Albany, N.Y. Still today, the company is referred to as McBride and Davidson. The problem is that there were not 2 men involved here. The owner was John McBride Davidson, one man not two. That little mistake has been handed down as fact for a long time and yes, will be found in "American Genius". Not a big deal but also not correct. Doug
    Perhaps, but I've caught several mistakes or omissions like the Premier one I mentioned & I'm only up to page 56. As an example, the description of George Wilder's Salamander Safe Lock on p. 50: 'In 1843 George Wilder of Brooklyn, New York, secured his patent...' If you use no other secondary research sources & go hunting for an 1843 patent to George Wilder in the USPTO, you won't find one. If, however, you pursue the 'Patented June 1 1843' found on the photograph of the lock, one of the first patents issued that day (US3117) was to Daniel Richardson & assigned to Enos Wilder having to do with safe fireproofing & not to a lock. Further research on the internet does bring out more details about the further involvement of George Wilder & Rich & Co in lock & safe design & marketing & the common use of the salamander design on safe doors as a mark of a safe's fire resistance ability.

    I've done a lot of research work in my career over the years & I fault the Erroll's book for both these kinds of lapses & for its lack of thorough footnoting in their discussions of inventions & patents.

    Jack
    Last edited by Jack Sullivan; 07-08-11 at 06:18 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio USA
    Posts
    1,433
    Country: United States

    Default

    Jack, your example of Wilder and the 1843 patent is not so much inaccurate as incomplete and slightly misleading. B.G. Wilder did obtain the patent rights in Sept of 1843 from Enos Wilder. Enos had already made a deal with Fitzgerald in 1839 for his fire protection methods which included the patent rights that followed in mid 1843. Also it was not unusual to reference safe patents on the dials or in this case the lock knob. But keep posting possible errors as you find them. Doug

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    133
    Country: United States

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doug MacQueen View Post
    Jack, your example of Wilder and the 1843 patent is not so much inaccurate as incomplete and slightly misleading. B.G. Wilder did obtain the patent rights in Sept of 1843 from Enos Wilder. Enos had already made a deal with Fitzgerald in 1839 for his fire protection methods which included the patent rights that followed in mid 1843. Also it was not unusual to reference safe patents on the dials or in this case the lock knob. But keep posting possible errors as you find them. Doug
    Doug

    Whatever. I hold this & other examples up as proof that the Erroll's book is the one that is incomplete & very misleading. I use it only as a point for digging deeper to find the real facts because this book is sadly lacking in hard facts. Since I have about 300 more pages to go I'm sure there will be more examples to illustrate my point.

    Jack

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    133
    Country: United States

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Sullivan View Post
    Doug

    Whatever. I hold this & other examples up as proof that the Erroll's book is the one that is incomplete & very misleading. I use it only as a point for digging deeper to find the real facts because this book is sadly lacking in hard facts. Since I have about 300 more pages to go I'm sure there will be more examples to illustrate my point.

    Jack
    Due to the fact that errors in the Erroll's book is greater in scope than just the examples mentioned in this thread, I'm starting a new thread on this topic.

    Jack

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    15
    Country: United States

    Default

    It's a Hall's premier safe lock size 4 (the largest one)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •