Welcome to our world exploring the Historical, Political and Technological aspects of Locks, Keys and Safes

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Cyberspace
    Posts
    1,339
    Country: Australia

    Default

    I think it's from a no-name third tier victorian maker with spurious markings.

    For the markings to have been 'right' for Chubb it would have been pre-1830 or thereabouts with a large direct throw iron door lock with a much bigger key.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Carlisle, England.
    Posts
    272
    Country: England

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oldlock View Post
    I think it's from a no-name third tier victorian maker with spurious markings.

    For the markings to have been 'right' for Chubb it would have been pre-1830 or thereabouts with a large direct throw iron door lock with a much bigger key.
    It never even occurred to me that key size could/would be a way to rule Chubb out. I've tried my early Chubb safe keys out of curiosity rather than unbelief and your certainly right Oldlock. That's the difference between a professional and a collector, collectors hope they have something special whereas professionals know when they have something special. Thanks once again.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    287
    Country: UK

    Default

    Remember also, how Mr Chubb railed against unscrupulous 19C safemakers who bought-in unsuitable genuine Chubb locks (usually cabinet locks, as Chubb did not sell safe locks to any other maker) so they could truthfully mark their safe (a 'jewelled gew-gaw', as Mr Chubb described them) "Chubb Lock".

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Cyberspace
    Posts
    1,339
    Country: Australia

    Default

    Indeed - like this one on ebay at the moment :

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Capture.JPG 
Views:	57 
Size:	41.8 KB 
ID:	16717

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Carlisle, England.
    Posts
    272
    Country: England

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oldlock View Post
    Indeed - like this one on ebay at the moment :

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Capture.JPG 
Views:	57 
Size:	41.8 KB 
ID:	16717
    . So this is not a genuine Chubb safe and only has an inferior chubb lock that Chubb would not put on one of their own branded safes?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    287
    Country: UK

    Default

    Correct - usually a drawer lock; and in those days, likely fitted to shoot upwards.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    287
    Country: UK

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oldlock View Post
    Indeed - like this one on ebay at the moment :

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Capture.JPG 
Views:	57 
Size:	41.8 KB 
ID:	16717
    Curiously, there are a couple of those coat of arms badges on Ebay currently. Do they look pre-1837? not that I am a heraldic expert.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Tilburg, The Netherlands
    Posts
    31
    Country: Netherlands

    Default How about this one?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSCF7243.jpg 
Views:	23 
Size:	1.30 MB 
ID:	17591Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSCF7244.jpg 
Views:	26 
Size:	1.18 MB 
ID:	17592Does anyone know it?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Devon UK
    Posts
    3,123
    Country: UK

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gerard Moonen View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSCF7243.jpg 
Views:	23 
Size:	1.30 MB 
ID:	17591Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSCF7244.jpg 
Views:	26 
Size:	1.18 MB 
ID:	17592Does anyone know it?
    "Currently Protected"? Is that a bad translation??

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Posts
    17
    Country: Australia

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chubbbramah View Post
    Curiously, there are a couple of those coat of arms badges on Ebay currently. Do they look pre-1837? not that I am a heraldic expert.
    Those arms are post 1837. A change in the Royal arms occurred in 1837 when Victoria ascended the throne. She was unable to ascend to Hanoverian throne, as she was a woman. Thus the central escutcheon (shield) of the house of Hanover was removed from the Royal arms. That central shield on the safe is also a lozenge (diamond) which was often used to depict a woman's arms.

    S

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •