Welcome to our world exploring the Historical, Political and Technological aspects of Locks, Keys and Safes

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,485
    Country: United States

    Default Diebold (?) door?

    On a recent trip I had the nerve to walk into a current Bank of America and asked to see their very nice old vault door. Rather than calling security and the FBI, the bank manager was so very kind to not only let me look at it and photograph it, but he also arranged to open it (they don't bother unless a customer needs access to a safe deposit box which is very occasional these days). I'm going to avoid pointing out which BofA this is.

    The first thing I learned is that an adjacent coupon room had the "outside end" of the ventilator which also included a viewing port in addition to an air/water/food port:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1201.JPG 
Views:	28 
Size:	483.9 KB 
ID:	15818

    The main event of course was the door which included an emergency door. From existing images I expected a Herring-Hall-Marvin door of the "twisty" (my nickname) variety. But the locks are Diebold (with two patent dates in 1870/1871 that point to three patents; I believe the building was constructed in 1908) and the time locks are Diebold.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1203.JPG 
Views:	43 
Size:	510.0 KB 
ID:	15819 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1205.JPG 
Views:	27 
Size:	629.9 KB 
ID:	15820 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1206.JPG 
Views:	37 
Size:	679.7 KB 
ID:	15821 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1207.JPG 
Views:	32 
Size:	673.0 KB 
ID:	15822 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1209.JPG 
Views:	34 
Size:	703.9 KB 
ID:	15823

    Some of the details are (as usual) interesting. The central round plate is etched "Built By Diebold Safe and Lock Co. Canton O." but notice it's held in place with Phillips-head screws? I didn't think Phillips-head even existed in 1908. So those are modern screws; is the plate too? Notice the springy mounting plate for the time lock itself. The locks are marked "Anti-Dynamite" but I didn't get a picture of that. The connecting rods do not have HHM's turnbuckles but that might just be the era they are from. And notice that to snake around the combination locks, two of the connecting rods have elegant "dog legs" to pass over the upper lock, while only one is dogged for the lower lock.

    There is an old antique-locks thread about a door that seems clearly HHM but that Diebold seems to have rebranded later, see http://www.antique-locks.com/showthr...r-sale-on-eBay. Is this a more carefully rebranded HHM or did Diebold copy the "twisty" boltwork for a short time?

    Another detail is that the floor originally had a drop segment. That was removed along with the rest of the raised floor at some time and now you have to step up to get into the vault.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio USA
    Posts
    1,433
    Country: United States

    Default

    Wylk, I am glad to hear you are getting some in person experiences with these vaults after all the hard work you have put into compiling info on them. Your "twisty" is a Benjamin Tripp, Boston vault engineer design built by HHM. Patent no. 816,049, 1906. The other, built by Diebold, is most likely also a Tripp door. Doug

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Bulgaria
    Posts
    686
    Country: Bulgaria

    Default

    What an attractive day gate, too.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,763
    Country: Wales

    Default

    Very ornate and some great patina on the door front!
    The air, food and water port looks a whacky bit of kit, unusual. Great pictures.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,485
    Country: United States

    Default

    Doug, thanks for your insight into Tripp being the designer/engineer. This seems similar to the situation with Emil Strauss (discussed several times in other threads) who also had his own boltwork design (US patent 869,992). Strauss would then subcontract with Diebold/Mosler/York to build the doors. Just for reference, Strauss' design (image by James Howe):

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Strauss 869992.jpg 
Views:	12 
Size:	282.4 KB 
ID:	15824 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Chicago Board of Trade Strauss - James Howe as shot.jpg 
Views:	16 
Size:	282.0 KB 
ID:	15825

    In Tripp's case the same now seems to be true. Though a majority of these doors appear to be HHM (and I now see I could be wrong here!) at least some of them were built by Diebold and possibly others.

    Is that a good generalization? Could the earlier Fort Worth door have been truly made by Diebold rather than rebranded?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •