Welcome to our world exploring the Historical, Political and Technological aspects of Locks, Keys and Safes

Results 1 to 10 of 40

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio USA
    Posts
    1,433
    Country: United States

    Default

    While I truly appreciate the pictures and the attempt to connect the development of safe and vault designs, I think you may be attributing more to Farrel than he deserves. That is not to put him down in any way. It is just that so much in the safe and vault designs is purely reactionary, and because of this it is not unusual to see the same or similar ideas popping up around the same time. Take pressure systems and crane hinges which you havre brought up. Once nitro came into use, makers strived to make the doors fit much tighter. Huh we have a problem. Yes we can slam it shut but we made the door so tight we can't pull it open. Make it even tighter and you can't even shut it. So the pressure bars and crane hinges come into use. I am not finding a Farrel patent regarding hinges for 1865 but here is a 1871 patent. I also don't know of a Diebold 1871 patent regarding hinges but maybe you have. Also included are a Diebold Kienzle showing a crane hinge and this safe is prior to 1874. A Herring Farrel showing the 1871 patent. A Harris, a Hall and a Detroit as well
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 101,245  Farrel & Weimar  1870.jpg   004_4_0001.JPG   Diebold Kienzle.JPG   Jos. Hall.JPG   Detroit.jpg  

    Harris.jpg  

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •