Welcome to our world exploring the Historical, Political and Technological aspects of Locks, Keys and Safes

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Is it a Mappin

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Cyberspace
    Posts
    1,358
    Country: Australia

    Default

    Just to avoid confusion - Whitfields safe co used Mappins Patent locks. So they are one & the same ...

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    89
    Country: UK

    Default Mappin's Patent

    Example of Mappin’s Patent Best 8-slide safe lock as illustrated in Samuel Whitfield’s sales leaflet of 1865.
    Walter Sandell Mappin was granted his patent 20th January 1862.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails S.Whitfield & Sons. Mappin's Patent.jpg   Samuel Whitfield and Sons. Catalogue page May 20th 1865.jpg  

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,816
    Country: Wales

    Default

    That's a particularly nice one Syd with the Mappin's patent markings as well as Whitfield's. Had a lot of those (think I've still got 4 or 5) but can't ever recall seeing any marked Mappin's, all I've got and seen only marked Whitfield & Co, mostly with just the word patent, implying that it's theirs.
    Also can't ever recall seeing an unmarked anonymous example like Richard's 4 slide lock.

    Unusual, but bearing in mind Whitfield originally used Cotterill's locks before changing to Mappin's , I'm wondering if Mappin's locks were also later churned out in numbers by other makers as was the case with the climax detectors.

    Cheers for posting that sales leaflet page- amazing to see those old prices back then and that their top of the range 12 slide double tier lock was exactly double the price of their best 8 slide safe lock -expensive stuff !

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    89
    Country: UK

    Default

    Thanks Huw for the comments. It’s possible that the inscription “Mappin’s Patent” on the top cap was no longer included when the name was changed to F.Whitfield & Co. by 1875.
    I cannot recall coming across another company making “copies” once the patent had expired, unlike the Cotterill lock.
    For reference I attach copy of Mappin’s 1862 patent .

    Regards Richard’s 4 slide lock I see no evidence that the “Click” feature is present , a key feature of the lock.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Mappins Patent . No140. A.D. 1862. Page 1.jpg   Mappins Patent 2-3.jpg   Mappins Patent . No140. A.D. 1862. Page 4-5.jpg   Mappins Patent. No.140. A.D. 1862. Page 6.jpg   Mappins Patent . No140. A.D. 1862. Sheet 1 -2.jpg  

    Mappins Patent . No140. A.D. 1862. Sheet 2.jpg   Mappins Patent . No140. A.D. 1862. Sheet 2-2.jpg   Mappins CLICK.jpg  

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    302
    Country: UK

    Default Mappin safe lock

    Unlike Syd's lock, there is indeed no clicker fitted. The four pins match the positions of four cuts in a Cotterill key I have, which also has three more cuts in the intermediate positions.
    The only marking on mine is '4664' on the nozzle. Inside the nozzle is a [hardened iron/steel?] disk.
    I am hoping to save myself some work by re-arranging my pins to match the cut key. This is how I have made several Bramah's operate with old keys, usually needing to make only one or two new sliders. But this lock is proving troublesome to work on. Pieces keep falling out, or sticking. Yale pin tumblers are much easier.
    Not sure if this one will ever be done — it just might be left to the next owner to do. I cannot stand at the bench for long, nor can i sit to do this :-( .

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •