Welcome to our world exploring the Historical, Political and Technological aspects of Locks, Keys and Safes

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 346

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,754
    Country: Wales

    Default Ultimate & One-off Freestanding Safes

    Hello everyone, here's a subject I've discussed with many people countless times over the years, and thought it'd be a good one to get some discussion going on here with members world-wide.

    Over the years a few of the big safe manufacturers have produced an 'ultimate' bespoke safe for unique circumstances, usually at the request of a large banking institution or private corporation.

    I'm talking free standing safes here, and not 'walk-in' strong rooms or vaults, which have of course been covered many times in other threads.

    By 'ultimate safe' I'm referring to unique one-offs or small-run (2 or 3 units for example) which are constructed differently and above a manufacturers standard production 'high grade' safes. I'm not thinking of the countless so-called 'luxury' safes on the European market, as these are mostly just re-worked 'badge engineered' versions of other manufacturers euro grade models.

    I remember seeing a safe on the net which I think was presented to the Vatican as a gift, for use by the Pope- again from what I could see it was yet another re-worked euro grader made by someone else, fitted with pointless gimmickry and it's 1 or 2 million price tag was meaningless, likewise another euro grader a few years back, (which I still fall off my chair laughing when I think about it) 'styled' like a Bugatti Veyron and actually licensed and endorsed by the company (with an equally ridiculous price tag).

    I'm not thinking of safes with ridiculous paint jobs, any of the so-called luxury models with plush interiors and automatic watch winders, carbon-fibre cladding etc. Also exempt is anything bling- 18K gold S&G combo dials with baguette diamonds set around the bezel (ohh yes- you'd be amazed) aren't what I'm talking here, I'm thinking of ultimate security safes built 100% for all-out protective security and defence.

    I'll start things off with a great candidate for number 1:

    1- 1980s SLS Gem

    This one, for me at least, is undisputable as only 2 were ever made, and both examples were uniquely constructed, and not just based on one of their existing top of the range Bankers Treasury models. They also produced a slightly lesser 'Sapphire' version of which a few more units were made.

    I think both were produced in the mid 1980s, and that one of the Gems was destined for HM the Queen at Buckingham Palace, and the other for private use in the Middle East. The latter example I think ended up at a US dealer and was offered for sale at about $45~$50,000 some years back.

    A truly serious safe of massive construction- although relatively small in terms of overall size, the protective door slab and walls were 8 inches thick, and it featured SLS's usual aluramic (aluminium with ceramic) armour with glass plates and randomly positioned live and dead relockers.

    2- 1929 Chatwood CB Quality

    Here's another of which only 2 were ever made. This one has been briefly covered in a post elsewhere on here, but surprisingly had little reaction. You can see a couple of very rare pictures kindly posted by safeman on his 'Very special Chatwood' thread.

    Produced purely at the unique request of the Commercial Bank of Scotland, ( the CB stands for commercial bank),both were identical and nothing short of monstrous in size and construction. Much larger sized than the SLS Gem, with 10 inch thick door slab and 10 inch walls and a weight of about 7 tons, this beautiful Chatwood is possibly the largest and heaviest free stander ever made?

    Also interesting is despite a door 15 inches thick overall, they didn't give it crane hinges and huge capstan handles 'vault door style', it just had an ordinary brass loop handle, standard hinges and looked pretty similar to one of their early Diamond safes.

    3- Tann Diamond

    This model started as a one-off special commissioned by DeBeers for storage of their most valuable stones at their London HQ. Featuring heavier walls and defences than their Super Treasury, the Diamond started out as a single bespoke unit but was so successful it resulted with DeBeers requesting several more. Tann's then went on to produce an altered, toned-down version of it as their standard top-of-the range safe above the Bankers and Treasury models.

    Other possible candidates:

    4- Chubb

    With such a long and prestigious history I think there must be many Chubb examples which we simply never got to hear about, especially in terms of those produced for Royal use.

    Their 'bird cage' built to secure the Ko-I-Noor (think that's how you spell it) diamond at the 1851 Great Exhibition is definitely one worthy of mention, but the overall principle it employed isn't really a 'free standing' safe as such.

    Likewise after the famous Cornhill robbery and other similar hold-ups they pioneered new secure containers for bullion and cash, but these were mostly heavy rectangular chests and strong boxes, and not really free standing safes proper.

    Chubb certainly made their mark with bespoke strong room and vault installations worldwide, but I'm not aware of any one-off ultimate safes to include here. Anyone know of any?

    5- Fichet- Le Super Fichet?

    Not sure of this one- there's some old literature floating around which might suggest this was just a very expensive top-of-the range model and not a commissioned one-off. They made a very heavy safe in the mid 1920s which I think was model 242. had a very thick stepped door and a weight of about 2500 kg- absolutely incredible for the size of the safe. Some suggest the later 'Le Super Fichet' of 1928 was a one-off improved version of the 242, but I don't know for sure. Anyone know anymore?

    There must be many others from all those European and American manufacturers, so it'd be great to hear what you guys can add from around the world

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,754
    Country: Wales

    Default

    I forgot to add the original Chubb Sovereign- not to be confused with the later model of much lower grade that chubb made with the same name. The one I'm referring to was immense, ridiculously heavy, very expensive and had the QZ prefix to the serial numbers- extremely rare safes.

    I can remember the original back in the mid 1980s and our Chubb safe rep joking he'd take us all to an expensive restaurant if we sold one- I think they only made them in 2 or possibly 3 sizes, the larger one costing £15,200 in 1985 or 86.

    What separated the Chubb was it's choice of barrier material- whereas most manufacturers went with aluminium for the defensive matrix on their top models, Chubb spared no expense and used solid copper dispersed with their barrier nuggets. Hence the price and the weight of them- not quite in the same league as the giant Chatwood CB Quality perhaps, but even so the Sovereigns weighed far more than the Bankers, Treasury and the Financier model which eventually replaced it.

    Not sure if they started out as a one-off commission as the Tann Diamond did, but it's definitely a possibility and worth being mentioned as I'm sure one of you guys will know.


    Also worth a mention is the original Chubb Planet- cream or brown plastic- anyone remember them before they went euro and become encapsulated in the steel shells? That's another that might have been the result of a unique commission on the basis and grounds of floor loading capacities on upper floors in buildings. Again I'm not sure though, so would be great if one of you guys know. Probably the best safe that never was!

    Chubb's DuPont developed (I think) barrier material- Ellox as they named it, really was a major breakthrough and perhaps even one of the most significant of recent times. Here we had a material and a safe which almost seemed to defy physics- A plastic polymer impregnated with near diamond-hard chips that could put up a fight against serious drill attacks, disc cutters, explosives and thermal cutting! And it was a third of the weight of anything else being used- and plastic!

    The original uncovered plastic version- what-you-see-is-what-you-get, wasn't around for long before the euro gradings changed everything and it evolved to a VdS tested euro grader- £35,000 cash rating with just 25 mm thick walls if I remember right- and still a fraction of the weight of most equivalent safes on the market- amazing stuff.

    Last I heard it was never a big seller because of it's cost, and that it was still being made I think in Holland, under the Lips wing of Gunnebo (sorry Adrian ;~), but I think even that's all become history now.

    I remember a lengthy chat with some serious plastics experts about 20 years ago, asking them about the thermoplastic Chubb had used for the Planet. They all thought it was a wind-up- firstly they'd never heard of it, secondly they seemed to doubt everything I was telling them, and thirdly they all scratched their heads and said that there wasn't a polymer or thermoplastic in the universe that could perform as the so-called Ellox material. I just picked up my Delrin and nylon bars I'd paid for and came away bewildered but smiling- for me that just made the Chubb Planet that extra bit special

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Aberdeenshire
    Posts
    697
    Country: Great Britain

    Default The 'Ultimate' safe.

    An interesting topic MaxVaultage which took me back a year or so when the safe-makers designed and built to defeat the criminal - not the test house.

    The exception could be the S.L.S. Gem which I've always believed was an ego trip on Mr. Painter's part to create the first rectangular bodied safe to attain the Underwriter's Laboratories certification in the category TX-TL60.

    This is where one of the pair went - didn't know about the other. It appeared for the first time in the Levy Safe Rating List '79 -'80 which I'll now admit was a mistake on my part as it was never going into production.

    A point about the Chatwood CB's hinges is that as the units were not for basement installation they did not need to be clenched and water resistant. Nor was the use of liquid NG considered to be a danger in this country.

    At the same time as my company acquired the four or five Chatwoods there were also some massive Chubbs of a similar protection level, one of which is still in use in an Aberdeen jewellers premises. They were very similar to the illustration but without the crane hinges.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Chubb ABP.jpg 
Views:	119 
Size:	179.1 KB 
ID:	11489Thanks for the memories.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,754
    Country: Wales

    Default

    Thanks for your reply safeman. I thought this'd be an interesting one which'd hopefully get some interesting discussion going, perhaps more will get time over Easter.

    I can't help thinking there must be some amazing examples lost in the shadows- hopefully some more will show up.

    Your correction on my SLS Gem dates reminded me of another- I didn't know the Gems were developed earlier in the late 70s, although thinking about it now it makes sense as I forgot to mention that for the Tann Diamond- around the same sort of time I think. Somewhere I've got a pile of old Locksmith Ledgers from the 70s/80s and remember the production version of the Tann aimed at the US market is mentioned in one around 1979 I think. I've also got a load of Keyways from around the same time, and although I remember some good articles on development and barrier materials I can't remember any mention of any of these. I'll have to dig them out and have another look.

    Also I made a big mistake when I said the SLS Gem featured their usual Aluramic barrier material- I should've remembered- it was actually a big step up using a mixture of copper/ceramics and stainless/ceramics- hence the weight of what was quite a dimensionally small safe.

    I can see where you're coming from when you refer to Mr. P's ego trip, but I think I can understand his thinking. If I'd been in his shoes at that time I'd have grabbed the opportunity and the whole 'unlimited' concept. Think of all the high temperature 'super-alloys' developed for jet engine turbine blades etc. Not to mention some of the ultra dense Tungsten alloys with a melting point over 6000F.

    Good job he was in charge really, as if I'd been resonsible it would have ended up 6 foot square, weighed 115 tons and had enough internal space for a mars bar.

    I can remember a few of the other safe manufactures referring to such 'ultimate safes' a few years later, saying that they also had the capability of producing an over-the-top unit offering an incredible level of resistive protection.

    How things change though- much more recent, around 10 years ago, I was talking to one of the big companies and they remarked that they did occasionally still get such requests for a one-off 'ultimate safe'. One was for a unit with half a million cash cover- if it'd had been down to me I'd have been out in the factory already making a start on it. Their reply was, with hindsight I suppose to be expected, but it did surprise me at the time- buy 5 of our grade V's and spread the contents between them! Not surprising I suppose, and it does make sense nowadays since it's all gone that way with risk management etc.

    Interesting about the Chatwood CB's- explains the basic hinges and emphasises it's conception uniquely for the CB's application.

    Also the Chubb's you mentioned. They seem pretty elusive with little information available. I've seen the crane hinged bankers before, although your picture shows a different variation with a beautifully fluted door pull and handle. perhaps the 'super' versions were one-off variations or even an early Sovereign? Interesting stuff

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    266
    Country: Germany

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Huw Eastwood View Post
    Chubb's DuPont developed (I think) barrier material- Ellox as they named it, really was a major breakthrough and perhaps even one of the most significant of recent times. Here we had a material and a safe which almost seemed to defy physics- A plastic polymer impregnated with near diamond-hard chips that could put up a fight against serious drill attacks, disc cutters, explosives and thermal cutting! And it was a third of the weight of anything else being used- and plastic!

    ...

    I remember a lengthy chat with some serious plastics experts about 20 years ago, asking them about the thermoplastic Chubb had used for the Planet. They all thought it was a wind-up- firstly they'd never heard of it, secondly they seemed to doubt everything I was telling them, and thirdly they all scratched their heads and said that there wasn't a polymer or thermoplastic in the universe that could perform as the so-called Ellox material.
    Patent GB2197362 might be describing the material of this all-plastic safe.

    The body and door of a safe ... constructed with a security barrier layer comprising an elastomer material such as polyurethane reinforced with elements of hard material such as aluminium or zirconium oxide. Onto this barrier is cast an outer elastomer layer..."

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Aberdeenshire
    Posts
    697
    Country: Great Britain

    Default Chubb Planet.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cepasaccus View Post
    Patent GB2197362 might be describing the material of this all-plastic safe.
    I have a few old notes regarding the Chubb Planet which may be of interest.


    This safe was made in Holland. It was featured in a Tomorrows World programme many years age where it was subjected to the application of a disk cutter with a high number of disk being worn down by the Aloxite. It was also sledged to make a comparison with standard safes. Then there was a standard fire and fall test. All very effective. The door was locked by a continuous single bolt plate.
    Although initially thought to be up to Grade 5 standard these early models were reported as having been recalled. Later versions were made with conventional metal bodies and may have been tested by Vds. As with TDR the material could be penetrated by skilled operators. They had some popularity where floor loading was a problem.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	planet 3.JPG 
Views:	20 
Size:	176.4 KB 
ID:	22892 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	planet 2.JPG 
Views:	16 
Size:	168.4 KB 
ID:	22891

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,754
    Country: Wales

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cepasaccus View Post
    Patent GB2197362 might be describing the material of this all-plastic safe.
    Quote Originally Posted by safeman View Post
    I have a few old notes regarding the Chubb Planet which may be of interest.


    This safe was made in Holland. It was featured in a Tomorrows World programme many years age where it was subjected to the application of a disk cutter with a high number of disk being worn down by the Aloxite. It was also sledged to make a comparison with standard safes. Then there was a standard fire and fall test. All very effective. The door was locked by a continuous single bolt plate.
    Although initially thought to be up to Grade 5 standard these early models were reported as having been recalled. Later versions were made with conventional metal bodies and may have been tested by Vds. As with TDR the material could be penetrated by skilled operators. They had some popularity where floor loading was a problem.
    Cheers Cerpasaccus, that’s definitely it from the description.

    Cheers safeman, I remember the launch of these in the 80s and have a brochure for the original all plastic Planet- like the one you’ve pictured, and remember seeing it featured on Tomorrow’s World. Never actually saw an original version out in the field though.

    Amazing technology for its time and still holds a few secrets we can learn from today in my view! Not only unique design and construction but also pioneering in terms of safe manufacture, as certain components were moulded in-situ as part of the overall structure.

    The later versions like you said were encapsulated in an outer steel shell to meet the European testing grades and became the EuroPlanet, which in my view pretty much defeated the object.
    All the additional steel increased the weight (and cost) significantly and like you said their appeal was in restricted weight applications.
    Like the superb 1970s Chubb Castelle before it (not the later rubbish with same name), many Planets found homes in wealthy city apartments where floor loadings were limited.
    But, with an already high price tag it became almost pointlessly non competitive once the weight and price increased further to meet the euro gradings.

    Also, as far as I know they were the one badged Chubb product that was only ever made at the LIPS factory in Holland, and continued long after all the other production had gone to Malaysia.

    Saw a few of the later euro grades with the steel outer but never an original ‘all plastic’.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,754
    Country: Wales

    Default

    Just watched the Tomorrow’s World footage and it was the later EuroPlanet that featured and not the original all plastic model as I thought- shows how memory blurs with time.
    I should have known from the tv screenshot safeman posted- the original mk1 colours were either a drab ivory beige or a hideous chocolate brown iirc.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    leeds
    Posts
    609
    Country: Great Britain

    Default

    I have worked on modern bode panzer atms and leicher modern grade 6 safes and high grade strongrooms and rate their quality and construction highly, not really seen their older stuff except for photos but think top quality gear.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    1,754
    Country: Wales

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 4402 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4402 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •