Welcome to our world exploring the Historical, Political and Technological aspects of Locks, Keys and Safes

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    7
    Country: United States

    Default Help with padlock identification please

    Hello,

    I located this forum while attempting to find information about nineteenth century padlocks on Google. We found a padlock with the key in it during the 2009 field school season and I am currently using it for a paper and likely as a piece of my thesis. So far I have not been able to find too much, from the shape it seems to perhaps be a smokehouse style padlock. Like far too many it has the initials V R with a crown overhead. There are no other visible markings even under magnification. Any assistance with the type of padlock it is or resources would be much appreciated. I know that manufacturer identification is unlikely given the dearth of markings.

    Thank you!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Padlock 01.jpg   Padlock 02.jpg   Padlock 03.jpg   Padlock 04.jpg  

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Posts
    1,327
    Country: United States

    Default

    Are you able to remove the key without breaking it for pictures of it? That would also help with the ID of this lock.

    First blush I would guess UK for place of origin.

    http://www.antique-locks.com/keys/16...tion-tips.html

    Also see this post if you want to remove the rust. It might destroy the lock being as much rust is there but maybe not. I would wait until other wade in on this.
    Last edited by Dean Nickel; 16-12-11 at 04:07 AM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    California, USA
    Posts
    216
    Country: United States

    Default Help with padlock identification

    Hello MStoddard -

    I think I can help you. The VR stands for Victoria Regina or Queen Victoria. The firm of Abraham Thompson of Willenhall, England manufactured padlocks with the letters VR under a crown. According to the web site "A Gazetter of Lock and Key Makers," A. Thompson imported locks to the United States. Go to this web site for further infomation.

    One observation I made was that the padlocks illustrated here had the company name under the crown and VR letters. Your padlock does not, but I still think it probably was made by Abraham Thompson.

    Scott

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    7
    Country: United States

    Default

    Hi Halflock. The key was firmly stuck in the lock when we found it. I would have loved to have removed it, but preservation is our main goal and we cannot risk damage to anything we find as it is all just considered on loan to us. Rust removal isn't an option as it has already undergone metal conservation in order to preserve it until we repatriate it at some future date. Thank you!

    Thank you Scott! I will look at that website for more information!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Devon UK
    Posts
    3,117
    Country: UK

    Default

    Yes VR means Queen Victoria (1837-1901) but those two letters were used by just about everybody, so I am afraid that you are unlikely ever to find out who made it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    7
    Country: United States

    Default

    Hi Tom, that is my worry as the V R gives it a timespan of 1837-1901. The brass keyhole cover leads me to 1840 or later based on info from A Guide to Artifacts of Colonial American by Ivor Noel Hume. Is the particular form factor of this lock significant? It is very similar in style to smokehouse locks, which despite their name were likely used for other purposes as well I am guessing.

    Zooming in heavily on the uncompressed photographs I took shows a few minor pits under the V R on the lock. Given the angle of wear cutting across the crown on the left side and on the V perhaps something may have been underneath at one point. The difference between the V and the R is quite dramatic and can also be seen in the loop at the bottom of the crown where the lower left corner has been completely worn away.

    I'm very interested in any input anyone may have. While I would love any extra details for this particular paper I am more interested in working this in to my thesis if I can nail down a small list of potential manufacturers to further investigate. Abraham Thompson seems to have some models very similar to this particular lock, did different manufacturers have models of similar make during the nineteenth century?

    Again thank you to everyone, I greatly appreciate your time!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Posts
    1,327
    Country: United States

    Default

    Can you get better pictures of the key pipe and key head? This might help a bit.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    7
    Country: United States

    Default

    I have a better picture of the key pipe on hand, somehow I didn't think to take one of the top of it and will do so as soon as I get back to the lab.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Padlock 05.jpg  

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Devon England
    Posts
    931
    Country: Great Britain

    Default

    I believe that this lock is from the time of William IV. If you look carefully at what appears to be a 'V' , you should notice that the 'V' is somewhat wrong and there is a faint line that forms the missing leg of 'W' Also, the line of stamping is way off centre compared to the crown. If you imagine that the 'V' is a 'W' then the line centralizes. Also, going from what I see in the pictures above, I believe that there was a deliberate attempt to remove or partially remove the 'W'.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    7
    Country: United States

    Default

    That could be an interesting possibility as the site is dating to the 1820s-1830s through other means. Was there ever a practice of manufacturers altering existing locks during the transitions between monarchs? I had thought that side may just be due to excessive wear and that the straight lines from top left to bottom right were perhaps just how it was originally but if that were the case then the lines themselves would likely be worn away as well.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •