Originally Posted by
Huw Eastwood
Interesting this if insurance companies actually followed this thinking.
This thread got me drawn into the whole RAL v EN hornets nest and it seems these comparison equivalents are a common misconception.
From what I've understood the RAL D tests through to E10 were very different to the EN's grades upto VI, they involved different tooling, and perhaps most crucial of all focused on different target aspects of the safes.
RAL's testing focused more on the body aimed at creating a hand sized hole to remove contents, whereas EN's also put importance to attack on the door.