+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 27 of 27
  1. #21
    Tom Gordon's Avatar
    Tom Gordon is offline Member This is Tom Gordon's Country Flag

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Devon UK
    Posts
    399

    Default

    Were they primarily designed to be released by the blast from gunpowder? -that would "normally" leave the safe-tech safe....

  2. #22
    Doug MacQueen is offline Member This is Doug MacQueen's Country Flag

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio USA
    Posts
    395

    Default

    Tom, in my experience the tear gas types were usually installed on less than secure large old fire safes used by jewelers. This type of safe did have the space needed for displays to be easily held. A lot of these did not have relocking devises and were often attacked at the dial in punching attacks sometimes successfully. So the unit is commonly mounted behind the lock itself. With the tear gas installed you may get the door open but you wont be real particular about what you grab other than something to cover your face. Of cpurse any explosives or heavy enough jolts to the safe could also break the glass. I did some reading about WWI warfare gases and found hundreds of chemical mixes were developed offering different results. This would explain why their use commercially as a deterrent started to show up after the war. Doug

  3. #23
    Tom Gordon's Avatar
    Tom Gordon is offline Member This is Tom Gordon's Country Flag

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Devon UK
    Posts
    399

    Default

    I have never heard of anything other than chlorine being used in the trenches over this side of the pond, but it would be odd if they werent investigating alternatives.

  4. #24
    Doug MacQueen is offline Member This is Doug MacQueen's Country Flag

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio USA
    Posts
    395

    Default

    The Germans started out with chlorine and ended up using mustard gas. Trying new things was the direct result of a reasonably effective defense coming into use. Much the same as the safe business. The Allies main gas was chloropicrin (trichlornitromethane). I think I got that right.

  5. #25
    wylk is offline Member This is wylk's Country Flag

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    204

    Default

    Getting back to the round doors --

    The only Hollar patent I have found so far is 533,298 (1895) for the boltwork on a rectangular door. There should also be at least one more patent, for his time lock. Does anybody know of Hollar's other patents?

  6. #26
    Doug MacQueen is offline Member This is Doug MacQueen's Country Flag

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio USA
    Posts
    395

    Default

    I had 6 but I knew I had seen more so I googled Hollar and came up with about 14 more. The specific ones you asked for are 621,341 for the round door I posted and 650,842 for the winder. Also 545,021 for the early version of the winder. i would list the rest but they are easily found Doug

  7. #27
    wylk is offline Member This is wylk's Country Flag

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    204

    Default

    OK, I figured out what I did wrong. I trusted Google Patents. I searched just for the inventor name "Hollar" but in fact their OCR-ing of the patent images is so absurdly awful it only showed up one patent. Once I changed my search to match "Hollar" in any field, many more matches (including a few false hits) showed up.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts